How I Define AGI
A follow-up essay: a working definition of AGI, how it will come about, and the precautions it needs.
I'm a student working toward original research in neuroscience, recording how I think we actually get there.
School and activities. Full resume →
Notes and essays about intelligence, AI, and the questions I keep coming back to.
A follow-up essay: a working definition of AGI, how it will come about, and the precautions it needs.
Why the brain's efficiency may be an important clue for building more general AI.
Investigations I'm actually running.
Comparing a regularized and an unregularized RNN trained on the classic 3-bit flip-flop task, using the fixed-point analysis methodology from Sussillo & Barak to see how regularization reshapes the dynamics the network actually learns.
"Does regularization change the underlying dynamics an RNN learns to solve the flip-flop task, or just how cleanly those dynamics can be read out?"
What I'm building to test the ideas I write about.
A resident assistant for my laptop, built in an evening and then rather a lot longer. It triages my inbox, keeps my calendar and task list, tells me who I've forgotten to reply to, drafts replies I still have to send myself, and clears out the caches quietly eating my disk. It is called Ponder, after the thinking it leaves me time for. It is unavailable for now while I make something new.
"An assistant is only useful if it remembers — and only safe if every irreversible thing it can do has a human in front of it."
A plan for how I think AGI actually gets built: stop feeding models the internet, and start feeding them the way a baby learns — small amounts of real, embodied, sensory experience gathered over time, instead of scraped text by the billions. Laid out in full, including the hardware gap it still has to solve and the safety precautions it needs from day one, in "How I Define AGI."
"If sample-efficiency is part of what makes intelligence general, simply scaling today's architectures may never cross the threshold into AGI — no matter how good the benchmark scores get."
What I'm working on and reading at the moment.
Areas I want to understand more deeply and contribute to over time.
Does regularization make small RNNs more robust to noise, or did the regularized network just start from a lower baseline loss? Retraining both from different random starting points, with matched training, is the next test.
I'm Ethan Ganz, a student working out how we actually get to artificial general intelligence — and what it'll mean once we do. My bet is that the answer runs through the brain: how it learns so much from so little, on about the power of a dim light bulb. So I study neuroscience, record what I think, and build small things to test it. I take the scaling camp seriously too — I just don't think anyone's settled it yet. Off the page, I'm on Math Team, TSA, and Science Olympiad, and I play tennis.